In general, any financial settlement should be fair, and should give priority to the welfare and needs of any children. Behaving badly, or committing adultery, does not affect this. Behaviour may, of course, affect any agreement on who looks after any children and what contact the other partner is allowed.
Extreme behaviour may be taken into account: for example, if one partner’s violence has had a lasting effect on the other. If one partner recklessly or deliberately sabotages the financial position – for example, by spending recklessly or destroying assets – this could also be taken into account.
You can agree a settlement at any time before or after you divorce, although it is advisable to do so before either partner remarries (see 10).
It is usually best if you can negotiate a settlement prior to the divorce. The court can then be asked to make any relevant financial orders at the same time as the grant of the decree nisi. (The decree nisi is granted when the court agrees that grounds for divorce have been proven; however, there is a further delay until the ‘decree absolute’ finalises the divorce.)
Not usually. It may be unwise to make excessively large payments to your spouse, as it might be argued that this shows both their need for such payments (or an equivalent transfer of assets) and your ability to pay. Even so, any financial settlement should take into account the longer-term history of the marriage and future financial prospects.
On the other hand, if your spouse does need maintenance while you are separated, it would normally be sensible to provide it. Failure to do so is likely to make your spouse more hostile towards you. Your spouse might apply to the court for an interim financial order requiring you to pay an appropriate level of maintenance. Both of these are likely to increase the overall level of acrimony – and costs – in reaching a final agreement.
You will still have the same rights to occupy the home as you had before, and can move back in if you choose.
There may be practical problems if, for example, your spouse changes the locks. While you will be entitled to get back in, it makes sense to ensure that you take anything you may need – such as important documents – with you in the first place.
There may also be other considerations and it is advisable to take advice before moving out.
If your spouse can make withdrawals from a joint account without your agreement, you run the risk that some or all of the money will be taken. You will also be jointly liable for any debts run up on the account. If you need access to the money yourself, or if you suspect that your spouse may misuse it, you may therefore want to close the account. The same applies to any other form of joint borrowing or spending facility, such as a joint credit card.
However, if you suddenly freeze accounts which your spouse needs to use for living expenses, this will create problems. Your spouse will want you to make appropriate maintenance payments, and may apply to the court for an interim financial order.
If your spouse is the sole owner of the family home, you should apply to the Land Registry to register an interest in the property. This will prevent the house being sold without your consent.
It depends on the circumstances. Factors to be taken into account include:
If, for example, two young people divorce after a brief, childless marriage, it might be fair for them to each walk away with the assets they brought into the marriage, and with neither paying the other maintenance.
On the other hand, suppose a couple have been married for 30 years, with the wife bringing up the children and looking after the home while the husband worked. A fair financial settlement might award the wife half the joint assets, including half her husband’s pension entitlement, and maintenance of half her husband’s income until he retires. This would reflect the value of the wife’s contribution to the marriage as a homemaker, and the fact that she would not now be in a position to suddenly start earning a large income.
If there are children, their needs – including maintenance – are dealt with separately and as a priority (see 11).
One option is to take out a life insurance policy on the life of your ex-spouse; as part of the financial settlement, you can negotiate that your ex-spouse pays the premiums on this policy. If your spouse is paying maintenance for your children, you can also arrange insurance to cover these payments until your children are grown up.
You may want to consider other forms of maintenance insurance, depending on your ex-spouse’s circumstances. For example, you could face problems if your ex-spouse is made redundant or can no longer work for some reason.
Alternatively, you may negotiate a ‘clean break’ settlement, so that there is no maintenance in the first place (see 13).
There is no reason why a man should not be able to claim maintenance: for example, if the woman is a high-earner. A fair settlement should take into account the same factors (see 6) regardless of gender.
If your spouse has not been paying maintenance, or has been paying maintenance on a voluntary basis, you will need to go to court to apply for a financial order. You can apply for an order at any time before or after the divorce, provided you have not remarried.
If there is already an order in place requiring your spouse to pay maintenance, but he or she fails to do so, you can go back to the court to ask them to enforce payment. For example, the court might issue an attachment of earnings order, so that your former spouse’s employer automatically pays you. You should take urgent legal advice if your spouse stops paying maintenance.
If you remarry without having reached a financial settlement with your former spouse, you may lose the right to make any financial claim against him or her. He or she will still have the same right to make a financial claim against you as before.
If you have previously reached a clean break settlement, the remarriage (or cohabitation) will normally have no effect – you have already made a once and for all agreement (see 13).
If you are paying your ex-spouse maintenance (this does not include child maintenance), maintenance ceases if the recipient remarries (but not if the recipient merely starts to cohabit). In any case, if your former spouse’s financial position improves, you can apply to the court to stop paying maintenance or to pay a reduced amount.
If you are receiving maintenance from your ex-spouse, you should normally continue to do so after he or she remarries.
The welfare of the children – including providing them with a home (see 18) – is a priority. Normally, this applies only to children aged 16 and under, or aged 18 or under and still in full-time education. The courts can, however, require you to provide maintenance to older children who are still in full-time education or who have special needs.
The Child Support Agency (CSA) has a formula for calculating the amount of maintenance that the ‘non-resident parent’ must pay to support children. Normally, this would be 15% of net income (for one child), 20% for two children, and 25% for three or more.
The amount can be reduced if the non-resident parent has other children to support or extra costs. There are also a number of other circumstances in which the CSA will vary the level of maintenance: for example, if a child spends more than one night a week with the non-resident parent.
In most cases, either parent can apply to the CSA to assess the level of maintenance to be paid. This will override any agreement between the parents.
In certain circumstances, either parent can apply to the courts for a ‘top-up’ of the level of maintenance. For example, to contribute to the cost of private education.
If you have both been treating a child as if he or she is your own, then the child is treated as a ‘child of the family' and you will have parental responsibility.
This means that if you separate, the child might continue to live with either parent, and the other parent could be ordered to pay child maintenance. For example, your ex-spouse could ask the court to order you to provide maintenance for your stepchildren and to continue paying for anything you paid for before you divorced such as boarding school fees. The court would take into account the ability of the child’s natural parents to provide financial support.
In many cases, yes. For example, a spouse who would have paid maintenance to the other can instead agree to transfer an appropriate lump sum and/or other assets. Of course, this may not be possible if sufficient assets are not available.
Once a ‘clean break’ agreement of this kind has been ratified by court order, neither of you will be able to go back to court in the future to ask for maintenance or a further transfer of assets. This gives both partners a much greater degree of certainty and allows them to completely disentangle their individual financial affairs.
However, it is not possible to agree a ‘clean break’ in respect of your obligation to provide maintenance for your children (see 11).
You may be able to negotiate agreement among yourselves, without lawyers. However, if there are significant assets involved, it is worth taking legal advice to make sure that your interests are being protected. Your lawyer can advise you on whether your proposed agreement is fair. Your lawyer can also advise you on the best way of structuring an agreement: for example, trading off property, assets, pension rights, maintenance and so on.
In practice, a good solution is often for the two parties to start by sitting down together to negotiate informally. Depending on the relationship and the complexity of the issues to be covered, you may want to involve your lawyers or a trained mediator. Ideally, this will allow you to reach broad agreement, leaving the lawyers to tidy up the details and paperwork. Even if you cannot reach agreement immediately, you will at least know what the problem areas are.
Where possible, it is best if you and your spouse can agree a settlement between yourselves, taking into account your own individual preferences. If the court is asked to impose a settlement, it may come up with a solution that suits neither of you. However, if your spouse is being unreasonable, you may want to apply to the court to resolve the dispute rather than simply allowing negotiations to drag on indefinitely. Take advice on the best way to approach this.
In any case, once you have reached agreement you should ask the court for a consent order (see 17).
Any settlement, if it is to be binding, will require both partners to give full disclosure of their respective circumstances.
Obtaining a divorce typically takes around four to six months. This includes a six week delay from the date of the decree nisi (when the court agrees that the grounds for the divorce have been proven) to the decree absolute (after which you are definitively divorced). The process can take longer if anyone fails to deal with the various pieces of paperwork promptly or your lawyer advises to delay applying for a decree absolute.
Arrangements for any children are dealt with at the same time as the divorce. You cannot obtain a decree absolute unless the court is satisfied that satisfactory arrangements for the children’s welfare are in place.
Reaching a financial settlement is a separate matter. How long this takes depends very much on your relationship with your spouse and the complexity of your financial affairs. Often, the financial settlement can be negotiated over the same period as the divorce proceedings, and is then confirmed by a consent order. Even where this is not the case, it is normally possible to reach a financial settlement in a matter of months rather than years.
During the process of negotiating a financial settlement, you will each use – and be responsible for paying – your own lawyer. As part of the settlement, however, one of you might negotiate that the other should pay part or all of their legal fees.
You can keep your legal fees down by agreeing as much as possible among yourselves. Fees can mount up if hostile spouses insist on conducting all the negotiations through the lawyers and arguing over trivial details.
You do not have to get a settlement approved by the court, but unless you do get a consent order, either of you will be able to change your minds. To get any form of clean break, you must have a court order.
If there are no children, the aim is to reach a fair financial settlement (see 6). Whether you can retain the home will depend primarily on how many other assets you have between you and what your individual preferences are. For example, if you have plenty of money, you might agree that one of you will keep the home but the other will receive a correspondingly large share of other assets. If your resources are more limited, you may need to agree to sell the home so that you can each buy a smaller property.
Where there are children the situation becomes more complex. The welfare of the children requires them to have a home where they can live with whichever parent will continue to look after them. If you have plenty of assets, it might well be ideal if the children stay in the family home while the other parent buys another home to move into. If assets are less abundant, it might make sense to sell the family home so that two cheaper homes can be bought.
The problem becomes more difficult when assets are more limited. The children and the parent living with them may want a large proportion of the assets, leaving the other parent with very little. However, a court would be unlikely to consider a very one-sided agreement to be fair.
Yes. Furthermore, there is no presumption that the individual who has built up the business has a greater claim to the business assets. The other partner’s contribution to the marriage – for example, by looking after the home and children – might be considered to be equally large. Depending on the circumstances, this might mean that each partner could claim entitlement to around half the value of the business.
In many circumstances, it is possible to agree a settlement which allows the business to continue. For example:
Where possible, courts try to avoid ordering a settlement which results in the break-up or liquidation of a business.
Assets held overseas can be taken into consideration in the same way as any other assets.
In practice, a spouse may seek to hide overseas assets, or to transfer assets overseas to make them more difficult to recover. If you suspect that your spouse is doing this, you should take immediate legal advice.
It depends on the circumstances.
Divorcing parties are required to disclose any trusts from which they benefit or expect to benefit, and the value of these benefits can be taken into account. There can be a grey area where the trustees of the trust have discretion over who will benefit.
If one of the spouses in a divorce has previously placed assets into trust, these assets might also be taken into account. Clearly, this will be the case if the ‘settlor’ is a beneficiary of the trust. It may also be possible to make a claim against the trust if it can be shown that the assets are still under the settlor’s control, or that the settler created the trust once the marriage started to break down with the specific aim of sheltering the assets from a claim.
Trust law is complex. You should take advice if you wish to place assets into trust, or to discuss what claim you might have against assets held in trust.
Your pension is a marital asset, like your home and other assets. The value of your pension can be taken into account in deciding a fair settlement.
Practical solutions can include:
Life insurance and endowment policies are taken into account when agreeing a fair settlement. You should agree how each policy will be handled, whether premiums will continue to be paid for regular contribution policies, and whether the beneficiaries of any life insurance cover will be changed.
You may choose to retain individual policies or to sell (or surrender) them. Any policies in joint names will normally be sold or transferred into one individual’s name. Early surrender of a policy may result in a sharp fall in the expected value of the policy; any surrender, sale or transfer may also have tax consequences. Take advice on the best option in your circumstances.
Usually not unless you are about to receive the inheritance.
The basic principle is that a financial settlement should be fair, based on factors such as the individual needs of the partners and the welfare of any children.
Where assets are sizeable you should certainly consider having a prenuptial agreement. For example, you might be able to use a prenuptial agreement to provide at least some protection to assets that you bring into the marriage (as opposed to assets that you build up during the marriage).
You can go to court to get the financial settlement altered.
You can go to court to ask them to change the maintenance order to reflect your circumstances. For example, you might do this if you lose your job and cannot find another one.
Assets transferred between spouses are exempt from capital gains tax (CGT). This exemption continues to apply during the tax year in which the spouses separate (regardless of the date when any divorce is granted).
Thereafter, any transfer will normally be treated as a sale at market value and subject to CGT (if the CGT annual exemption level is exceeded). However, the transfer of the family home to the spouse who still lives in it will continue to be exempt from CGT in most circumstances. The transfer of a property as part of a divorce settlement is also exempt from stamp duty.
Transfers of assets between spouses are exempt from any potential inheritance tax liability. This usually continues to be the case for any transfer made after divorce as part of a financial settlement.
Tax rules are complex; you should take advice on the best way to minimise the tax consequences of a divorce.
If you are over 70 years old, there is a very limited tax relief available, and only if you are legally required to make the maintenance payments. Younger maintenance payers do not qualify for any tax relief.
No income tax is due on maintenance payments you receive.
Usually yes. When you get divorced, your ex-spouse is automatically excluded from your will as either a beneficiary or an executor. (Note that this is not the case if you have merely separated.) Unless you draw up a new will, this can have undesired consequences.
For example, your original will might have been drawn up on the assumption that your spouse would take care of the children using the money left to him or her. With the ex-spouse excluded from the will, you might now want to arrange an appropriate trust to hold the inheritance for the children. More broadly, you may want to alter the way assets are shared among the various beneficiaries.
If you do want your former spouse to continue to be a beneficiary, you must draw up a new will. In some cases, the financial settlement you agree when you divorce may require one or both of you to make provision in your will for your ex-spouse and any children. This might be appropriate, for example, if you are paying continuing maintenance.
Note also that if your ex-spouse remains dependent on you, in some circumstances it may be possible to challenge your will if it does not make adequate provision for him or her. Your own wishes are more likely to be followed if you draw up a new will that takes this into account.